Asphalt Paving Versus Concrete

Whenever asphalt paving is considered, the use of asphalt VS concrete always produces a bit of conflict. The most typical modern-day paving techniques nonetheless are asphalt and concrete.

Because of the assortment of ways the products can be used, both asphalt and concrete have a long history in the building sector. In regard to paving vs concrete the biggest disagreement has actually been regarding preliminary price.

Now comes the unavoidable question, "Which is the much better product for parking areas and/or garage surfaces?" The answer may shock nearly everybody. And if you are a residential property or business, the outcomes reported by industry professionals in addition to scientific research are very revealing.

Many online resource list the benefits and pitfalls of concrete paving:

– Concrete is more susceptible to splitting and twisting due to the fact that it’s heavy and firm layout. Tree Roots, Ground Movements, Freeze Thaw Cycles and dirt movement are huge contributors to concretes damage.

– Based on the Ohio Motorway Percentage, concrete prices of $70-100 each cubic backyard were more than double the expenses of asphalt paving. All Ohio freeway paving is now finished with asphalt.

– Concrete paving of parking lots and garage areas calls for more time and initial price than asphalt paving. This hold specifically true the larger a projects.

– Fixes to concrete paving surfaces are more expensive to repair than asphalt. They also do not blend as asphalt paving does. Especially after asphalt gets freshly sealed.

+ Concrete paving can last far longer than asphalt paving areas (environmental factors not withstanding).

+ Concrete paving maintenance costs over time are typically less expensive than asphalt paving.

+ Concrete paving needs far less on-going maintenance to keep its toughness.

The pros and cons of asphalt paving:

– Asphalt needs upkeep consisting of seal coating, crack filling, and other forgotten expenses.

+ Asphalt Paving offers better environmental adaptability over concrete in regards to managing tension and fracturing.

+ Asphalt is the best for easy pothole repair. It can be used as a cool spot, warm spot, and become a long-lasting answer for fixing potholes in a much shorter quantity of time than concrete and various other even more pricey hybrid combinations. BUT: Potholes are far much less likely in concrete.

+ In addition to pothole repair, asphalt is most often appropriate for use in maintaining and repairing parking areas, drives, and streets. The preparation for paving with asphalt is relatively simple. Asphalt paving can be done directly over today sidewalk, walkways, driveways and parking lots in most cases.

+ Asphalt is really durable, resilient and climate resistant along with being immune to chemical damage.

– If Asphalt is not maintained, the costs and damages can escalate.

+ Asphalt sets much faster compared to concrete offering it a strong advantage in both expense and comfort for parking area and garage paving.

In short

Asphalt: Asphalt is a more environmentally friendly and recyclable paving product that provides many benefits for roadway, garage, and auto parking location applications. With its expenses spread over time. Initial costs for new pavement are far cheaper with asphalt than with concrete. Asphalt paving is by far the more preferred option for car parking circumstances and garage paving. Nonetheless, those initial savings are mitigated over the first 5 years of installment via expensive and continuous asphalt maintenance requirements (if properly maintained).


Concrete paving is a long lasting, reasonable maintenance expense item which looks terrific over time. Over the life period of 20-30 years or more. The long term maintenance costs of concrete are typically less but the initial outlay is more. That said, repair costs for concrete areas are a lot more costly to repair compared to asphalt. Asphalt paving can easily be done straight over the current pavement in many situations.

For any given project, life-cycle costs should be considered however it’s rare that you can amortize your investment in equal payments over time. So even if life cycle costs of concrete were less expensive (that’s a questionable assumption), the initial cost for new pavement, the cost to repair and the maintainability of the property favor asphalt.